Fueron negros los que desarrollaron la tierra caliente, no sólo en Colombia sino en todo el mundo. Fueron negros los que extrajeron el oro que hizo rica a la colonia, los que cultivaron la caña, a los que cavaron el Canal de Panamá y los que construyeron las obras públicas. Sin ellos no existiría la llamada “civilización”, de la cual la clase dominante y los blancos se jactan tan orgullosamente llamándola suya, diciendo que los negros son indignos de tal “civilización.”
— Mateo Mina, Esclavitud y Libertad en el Valle del Río Cauca
It was the blacks who developed the hot lands, not only in Colombia but throughout the world. It were blacks that extracted the gold that made the colony wealthy, they grew the cane, they dug the Panama Canal, and they built the public works. Without them there would be nothing called “civilization “, which the white ruling classes are so proud of calling their own, saying that the blacks are undeserving of such a “civilization.”
— Matthew Mina, Slavery and Freedom in Cauca River Valley.
There is something compelling about Esclavitud y Libertad en el Valle del Río Cauca. Michael Taussig, one of the most well known English language anthropologists of Colombia, wrote the short book of non-fiction in Spanish under the pen name Mateo Mina in the early 1970s. In choosing his pen name, Tuassig pays homage to a leader of the slave rebellions of the 19th century. Taussig’s words have a clarity that I find refreshing in the evening heat of Quibdó. He describes the conflicts over land in the north of the department of the Caucua. The way that the land owning classes used violence, technology, and the language of civilization to force black peasants from their land, with disastrous cultural, social, and economic results.
Esclavitud y Libertad is a precursor to Taussig’s later works on the devil and commodity fetishism, violence and healing, the magic of the state, and so forth. What makes the book interesting is that although it is clearly within a framework of class analysis, with a linear progression that is reminiscent of a simplistic Marxist analysis, Taussig also makes few theoretical digressions, which accompany so much of his later work. Indeed, it has a clear direct language that his more literary endeavours lack, although there is a foreshadowing to that in his later work.
The book is compelling precisely because of its (then contemporary) economic history of the area around Puerto Tejida. He describes the abundance and richness of the land in the area during the pre-colonial period, the horrors of Spanish slavery, and the rebellions and resistance the second half of the 19th century when black peasants fought for their land. He concludes with period of consolidation of land in the hands of a the dominant classes in the twentieth century with the War of a Thousand days, La Violencia, and the ‘green revolution,’ and the impact of all this process on peasant society.
In the book’s linearity, Taussig probably misses much of the nuances of these historical forces. Things were perhaps never so clear cut. Yet, it is the simplicity of the basic account that makes the book all the stronger. The lack of jargon, the lack of theory, and the space that he gives to voices from the archives and interviews is compelling. It is strange to write, but there is something about his story of the landed and the landless, the worker and the boss, that is compelling, although I have an undergraduate degree filled with postmodern critique of these simple stories.
Taussig wrote Esclavitud y Libertad at the beginning of a long career. I find it thought provoking as I think about what will result from my own doctoral work on gold mining in the Chocó.
Spanish, 164 pages, 1975, Publicaciones de la Rosca.
Posted at 3:22pm and tagged with: books,.